The FAIB 767 is the most unpleasant AI traffic aircraft paint kit I have ever worked with, and the FAIB 747 comes in at a near second place. Erez updated the models at some point and forgot to re-map the textures to match, so there are some seam irregularities that require an inordinate amount of time to make rightl, plus 4-sided texture alignment of cheatline stripes is a complete pain in the neck. Since FSPX 767s have option of 2-side or 4-side texturing (for wraparound schemes and such), and they have more antennae/dome/beacon placement options; the FSPX models IMHO are far superior. 99.99% of all the retro painting I have done on the FSPX 767s (and WB ABs) only requires the 2-side texture model. Again, FSPX models are cheap for all of the options you get……Mike P.
Mikey's Retro FS Corner 
Why not FAIB model that is better?
LikeLike
The FAIB 767 is the most unpleasant AI traffic aircraft paint kit I have ever worked with, and the FAIB 747 comes in at a near second place. Erez updated the models at some point and forgot to re-map the textures to match, so there are some seam irregularities that require an inordinate amount of time to make rightl, plus 4-sided texture alignment of cheatline stripes is a complete pain in the neck. Since FSPX 767s have option of 2-side or 4-side texturing (for wraparound schemes and such), and they have more antennae/dome/beacon placement options; the FSPX models IMHO are far superior. 99.99% of all the retro painting I have done on the FSPX 767s (and WB ABs) only requires the 2-side texture model. Again, FSPX models are cheap for all of the options you get……Mike P.
LikeLike